Calculating neutrino oscillations requires a lot of rotations between different bases.
There are three most used bases, vacuum basis which diagonalizes the vacuum Hamiltonian, flavor basis where the flavor states stay, and instataneous matter basis which diagonializes the Hamiltonian with constant matter interaction or the instataneous matter interaction.
The rotation from vacuum basis wavefunction \(\Psi_v\) to flavor basis \(\Psi_f\) is
where the rotation is
The rotation from matter basis wavefunction \(\Psi_m\) to flavor basis wavefunction \(\Psi_f\) is
where the roation is
The matter mixing angle is determined by the matter potential \(\lambda = \sqrt{2}G_F n_e\),
where \(\omega = \delta m^2 /2E\) is the vacuum frequency of neutrinos.
Rotate Twice
A rotation from vacuum basis to flavor basis then to matter basis is simply the addition of the two rotation, i.e.,
Rotate \(\sigma_1\) from vacuum basis to flavor basis,
Rotate \(\sigma_3\) from vacuum basis to flavor basis,
Given the vacuum basis Hamiltonian \(H_v\), we can rotation it to flavor basis by using the rotation \(R_{v2f}(\theta_v)\)
Similarly, the flavor basis Hamiltonian \(H_f\) can also be calculated from matter basis Hamiltonian \(H_m\) ,
Vacuum Basis Hamiltonian
The Hamiltonian in this basis is composed of vacuum Hamiltonian which is diagonalized and the matter potential rotated from flavor basis,
Flavor Basis Hamiltonian
As a consistancy check, we now rotate Hamiltonian in vacuum basis to flavor basis.
Numerical Calculation of The Rotations
To write clean code, it is better to define and test there rotations first.
In vacuum basis, Hamiltonian with matter interaction is
where we have got a contribution of \(\sigma_3\) from matter interaction. By carefully defining a transformation that removes this contribution, we can define a new basis in which the wavefunction is \(\Psi_b\), which is related to the vacuum basis wavefunction in the following way,
where \(\eta(x)\) is a function of position. We can find the requirement of it by plugging the wavefunction into Schrodinger equation, which results in
Derivation of \(\eta\)
Plug the transformation into Schrodinger equation,
Multiplying on both sides of the equation the Hermitian conjugate of the transformation matrix
the two sides becomes
We choose the condition that
which removes the second term in the Hamiltonian in vacuum basis. Finally we have the equation of motion in this new basis
We could even remove all the \(\sigma_3\) terms using this method by choosing
The general solution of \(\eta(x)\) is
where the constant can always be set to 0, which tells us that
Constant Matter Density
As a check, for constant \(\lambda\), we have
In this new basis, the Hamiltonian becomes
For a Hamiltonian with matter interection,
where \(\lambda(x) = \lambda_0 + \lambda_1(x)\). We rotate it into constant matter basis where the Hamiltonian is diagonalized with only \(\lambda_0\),
where \(U\) rotates the state from vacuum basis to constant matter basis.
In general the Hamiltonian after the rotation is written in a form
in which \(R_{f2m}\) is the rotation from flavor basis to constant matter basis and \(\lambda_{1,f}\) is the perturbation of matter profile in flavor basis. We also have
and
Another Form of Matter Potential
For the perturbation we could also make it traceless without changing the probabilities.
Position Dependent Rotation
If the rotation is position dependent, i.e., the matter profile \(\lambda_0\) is not position independent, we have, in general,
In the case of discussion here, \(\frac{d}{dx} R_{f2m}=0\).
© 2021, Lei Ma | Created with Sphinx and . | On GitHub | Physics Notebook Statistical Mechanics Notebook Index | Page Source